A Wearable Sensor-Based Exercise Biofeedback System: Mixed Methods Evaluation of Formulift
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
Download | insight_publication.pdf | 673.39 kB | Adobe PDF |
Title: | A Wearable Sensor-Based Exercise Biofeedback System: Mixed Methods Evaluation of Formulift | Authors: | O'Reilly, Martin; Slevin, Patrick; Ward, Tomás; Caulfield, Brian | Permanent link: | http://hdl.handle.net/10197/9662 | Date: | 31-Jan-2018 | Online since: | 2019-03-22T12:38:51Z | Abstract: | Background: Formulift is a newly developed mobile health (mHealth) app that connects to a single inertial measurement unit (IMU) worn on the left thigh. The IMU captures users movements as they exercise, and the app analyzes the data to count repetitions in real time and classify users exercise technique. The app also offers feedback and guidance to users on exercising safely and effectively. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the Formulift system with three different and realistic types of potential users (beginner gym-goers, experienced gym-goers, and qualified strength and conditioning [S&C] coaches) under a number of categories: (1) usability, (2) functionality, (3) the perceived impact of the system, and (4) the subjective quality of the system. It was also desired to discover suggestions for future improvements to the system. Methods: A total of 15 healthy volunteers participated (12 males; 3 females; age: 23.8 years [SD 1.80]; height: 1.79 m [SD0.07], body mass: 78.4 kg [SD 9.6]). Five participants were beginner gym-goers, 5 were experienced gym-goers, and 5 were qualified and practicing S&C coaches. IMU data were first collected from each participant to create individualized exercise classifiers for them. They then completed a number of non exercise-related tasks with the app. Following this, a workout was completed using the system, involving squats, dead lifts, lunges, and single-leg squats. Participants were then interviewed about their user experience and completed the System Usability Scale (SUS) and the user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS). Thematic analysis was completed on all interview transcripts, and survey results were analyzed. Results: Qualitative and quantitative analysis found the system has good to excellent usability. The system achieved a mean (SD) SUS usability score of 79.2 (8.8). Functionality was also deemed to be good, with many users reporting positively on the systems repetition counting, technique classification, and feedback. A number of bugs were found, and other suggested changes to the system were also made. The overall subjective quality of the app was good, with a median star rating of 4 out of 5 (interquartile range, IQR: 3-5). Participants also reported that the system would aid their technique, provide motivation, reassure them, and help them avoid injury. Conclusions: This study demonstrated an overall positive evaluation of Formulift in the categories of usability, functionality, perceived impact, and subjective quality. Users also suggested a number of changes for future iterations of the system. These findings are the first of their kind and show great promise for wearable sensor-based exercise biofeedback systems. | Funding Details: | Irish Research Council Science Foundation Ireland |
Type of material: | Journal Article | Publisher: | JMIR Publications | Journal: | JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth | Volume: | 6 | Issue: | 1 | Start page: | e33 | Copyright (published version): | 2018 the Authors | Keywords: | mHealth; Feedback; Posture; Exercise therapy; Biomedical technology; Lower extremity; Physical therapy specialty | DOI: | 10.2196/mhealth.8115 | Language: | en | Status of Item: | Peer reviewed | This item is made available under a Creative Commons License: | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/ |
Appears in Collections: | Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science Research Collection Insight Research Collection |
Show full item record
SCOPUSTM
Citations
50
4
Last Week
0
0
Last month
1
1
checked on Sep 12, 2020
Page view(s)
667
Last Week
2
2
Last month
18
18
checked on Jun 27, 2022
Download(s)
219
checked on Jun 27, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
If you are a publisher or author and have copyright concerns for any item, please email research.repository@ucd.ie and the item will be withdrawn immediately. The author or person responsible for depositing the article will be contacted within one business day.