Service operations: what have we learned?

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVictorino, Liana-
dc.contributor.authorField, Joy M.-
dc.contributor.authorBuell, Ryan W.-
dc.contributor.authorSecchi, Enrico-
dc.contributor.authoret al.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-16T11:15:15Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-16T11:15:15Z-
dc.date.copyright2018 Emerald Publishing Ltden_US
dc.date.issued2018-01-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Service Managementen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10197/9982-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper is to identify research themes in service operations that have great potential for exciting and innovative conceptual and empirical work. To frame these research themes, the paper provides a systematic literature review of operations articles published in the Journal of Service Management (JOSM). The thorough review of published work in JOSM and proposed research themes are presented in hopes that they will inspire impactful research on service operations. These themes are further developed in a companion paper, “Service operations: what’s next?” (Field et al., 2018). Design/methodology/approach The JOSM Service Operations Expert Research Panel conducted a Delphi study to generate research themes where leading-edge research on service operations is being done or has yet to be done. Nearly 700 articles published in JOSM from its inception through 2016 were reviewed and classified by discipline focus. The subset of service operations articles was then further categorized according to the eight identified research themes plus an additional category that primarily represented traditional manufacturing approaches applied in service settings. Findings From the Delphi study, the following key themes emerged: service supply networks, evaluating and measuring service operations performance, understanding customer and employee behavior in service operations, managing servitization, managing knowledge-based service contexts, managing participation roles and responsibilities in service operations, addressing society’s challenges through service operations, and the operational implications of the sharing economy. Based on the literature review, approximately 20 percent of the published work in JOSM is operations focused, with earlier articles predominantly applying traditional manufacturing approaches in service settings. However, the percentage of these traditional types of articles has been steadily decreasing, suggesting a trend toward dedicated research frameworks and themes that are unique to the design and management of services operations. Originality/value The paper presents key research themes for advancing conceptual and empirical research on service operations. Additionally, a review of the past and current landscape of operations articles published in JOSM offers an understanding of the scholarly conversation so far and sets a foundation from which to build future research.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEmeralden_US
dc.rightsThis article is © Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here http://researchrepository.ucd.ie. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limiteden_US
dc.subjectService operationsen_US
dc.subjectService supply networksen_US
dc.subjectService operations performanceen_US
dc.subjectCustomer and employee behaviouren_US
dc.subjectServitizationen_US
dc.subjectKnowledge-based servicesen_US
dc.subjectParticipation roles and responsibilitiesen_US
dc.subjectSustainable servicesen_US
dc.subjectSocial impact servicesen_US
dc.subjectSharing economyen_US
dc.subjectDelphi studyen_US
dc.subjectJOSM literature reviewen_US
dc.titleService operations: what have we learned?en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.internal.authorcontactotherenrico.secchi@ucd.ieen_US
dc.statusPeer revieweden_US
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage39en_US
dc.identifier.endpage54en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/JOSM-08-2017-0192-
dc.neeo.contributorLiana Victorino|Joy M. Field, Ryan W. Buell, Michael J. Dixon, Susan Meyer Goldstein, Larry J. Menor, Madeleine E. Pullman, Aleda V. Roth, Enrico Secchi, Jie J. Zhang|aut|-
dc.internal.rmsid882495762-
dc.date.updated2018-05-18T16:59:17Z-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/en
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Business Research Collection
Files in This Item:
 File SizeFormat
DownloadService_Operations_Whats_Have_We_Learned_R1_11-13-17.docx72.9 kBMicrosoft Word
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

10
Last Week
1
Last month
1
checked on Sep 12, 2020

Page view(s)

721
Last Week
4
Last month
13
checked on Sep 24, 2022

Download(s) 50

451
checked on Sep 24, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


If you are a publisher or author and have copyright concerns for any item, please email research.repository@ucd.ie and the item will be withdrawn immediately. The author or person responsible for depositing the article will be contacted within one business day.