Mossa, Mahmoud A.Mahmoud A.MossaEcheikh, HamdiHamdiEcheikhDiab, Ahmed A. ZakiAhmed A. ZakiDiabAlhelou, Hassan HaesHassan HaesAlhelouSiano, PierluigiPierluigiSiano2024-01-262024-01-262021 the A2021-02-28Energies1996-1073http://hdl.handle.net/10197/25328The need for regulating the operation of unhealthy motor drives has motivated the researchers to modify the control techniques in order to be valid for the new drive state. The use of a fault-tolerant facility is an attractive feature of multiphase machines; therefore, the applicability of different controllers has been established for the operation under open-phase fault conditions. The considered control algorithms were utilized to analyze the operation of the unhealthy system and evaluating the capability of the control to regulate the speed and torque under the fault condition. However, the majority of these studies considered only one control algorithm to be tested with the faulty system without comparing its performance with other techniques. The performance comparison is a vital way to visualize the features and characteristics of each algorithm. For this purpose, this paper deals with the performance comparison of the hysteresis controller, RFOC based on resonant controller and direct torque control (DTC) control under open-circuit fault conditions. A detailed comparison between the three control techniques is presented to outline the main differences between the three control procedures and identify the most appropriate technique in betweenenThis article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Five-phase IMDTCResonant controller PRRFOCOpen phase fault operationFault-tolerant capabilityJournal Article14510.3390/en140513172021-04-24SFI/15/SPP/E3125https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/