Székely Calma, IuliaIuliaSzékely Calma2019-06-112019-06-112018 Insty2018Przegląd Tomistyczny0860-0015http://hdl.handle.net/10197/10785This article proposes an insight into the quodlibetical disputations that took place at the beginning of the 15th century at the University of Prague. At times, the topics of these disputations reflect the views against the Catholic Church that Jan Hus and other masters were exploring in those days. The current article edits and examines two questions taken from the manual of Jan Arsen of Langenfeld, a German Master of Arts from the University of Prague. These questions were conceived for the disputations that he led around 1400 and provided an interpretation of the propositions extracted from or inspired by the Book of Causes. A thorough analysis of the sources and influences of these questions shows that arguments and phrases circulated from one Master to another, from one quodlibetal disputation to another, hence consolidating a specific philosophical and theological tradition.enQuodlibetLiber de causisBook of CausesJan Arsen de LangenfeldMatthias KninProcope de KladrubySimon de TišnovJohannes WyclifJournal ArticleXXIV2272542019-05-23771640https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/