Georgiadou, YolaYolaGeorgiadouHarvey, FrancisFrancisHarveyMiscione, GianlucaGianlucaMiscione2014-10-062014-10-062009 the A2009-06-15http://hdl.handle.net/10197/6009Global Spatial Data Infrastructure 11 World Conference: SDI Convergence: Building SDI Bridges to Address Global Challenges, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 15-19 June, 2009A weakness of spatial data infrastructure (SDI) studies has been the limited uptake of research outside of positivist and scientific-technological perspectives. To put it simply, a study of a SDI without considering other philosophies of knowledge will be greatly constrained to technical and administrative organizational dimensions. The ontological uniformity of SDI studies is unnecessarily restrictive. While valuable in a narrowly defined framework of project, SDI studies should consider the larger set of interactions involving actors in political, administrative and socio-technical domains. We review the development of information system research approaches and consider key positions from its diverse ontologies (positivism and interpretivism) and theories (strategic alignment, interactionism and social construction). We point to possible ways to consider these positions in SDI research.enSDIInformation systemsGovernanceScience and technology studiesConference Publication2014-08-13https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/