Thornton, LiamLiamThornton2015-01-152015-01-152014-12-10Irish Community Development Law Journalhttp://hdl.handle.net/10197/6293The system of direct provision for asylum seekers is 14 years old. Direct provision is where asylum seekers are provided with bed and board, along with a weekly allowance of €19.10 per week per adult or €9.60 per week per child. Asylum seekers are not entitled to any other social welfare payments and cannot seek or enter employment, on pain of criminal sanction. Direct provision, introduced in April 2000, came at a time of considerable moral panic about 'welfare abuse' by asylum seekers in Ireland. For over 14 years, this system has existed on an extra-legislative basis and without any in-depth examination, from the Legislature, the Executive or the Judiciary on the impact of direct provision on the civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights of asylum seekers. Hanna Arendt, in The Origins of Totalitarianism noted that the world sees noting sacred in 'the abstract nakedness of being human'. Using Arendt’s views as a starting point, this paper explores Ireland’s legal obligations towards those seeking protection in Ireland. Examining our international, European and domestic obligations, the paper will seek to explore whether the system of direct provision complies with fundamental human rights law and norms. With a judicial review of the totality of the direct provision system currently before the High Court, this paper provides an analysis of how 'the right to have rights' for asylum seekers is limited.enAsylum seekersDirect provisionHuman rightsSocio-economic rightsSocial rightsEconomic rightsJournal Article3222422014-12-11https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/