Crowley, Timothy J.Timothy J.Crowley2022-06-162022-06-162021-01-25978-90-04-31817-5http://hdl.handle.net/10197/12916In this paper I discuss the meaning and significance of Aristotle’s claim that Empedocles “was the first to speak of the four so-called elements of the material kind” (Metaph. I.4, 985a32). I argue that this claim tells us a great deal about the reception of the four elements hypothesis, i.e., the hypothesis that that fire, air, water, and earth are the elements of bodies. Firstly, it indicates that the hypothesis is a familiar one among Aristotle’s contemporaries. Secondly, the fact that Aristotle highlights the priority of Empedocles is evidence that Empedocles’ priority was not well known to his contemporaries. I suggest, moreover, that we should not presume that it was well known to Aristotle’s contemporaries that Empedocles held the four elements hypothesis. Empedocles’ theory is best understood as a version of a view that had become popular already by Plato’s time.enEmpedoclean elementsStoicheiaOriginalityLove and strifeMoving causeEfficient causeAristotleAristotle, Empedocles, and the Reception of the Four Elements HypothesisBook Chapter35237610.1163/9789004443358_0132022-06-08https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/