Tynan, RichardRichardTynanO'Grady, Michael J.Michael J.O'GradyO'Hare, G. M. P. (Greg M. P.)G. M. P. (Greg M. P.)O'HareMuldoon, ConorConorMuldoon2009-07-142009-07-142009-05978-1-4244-3999-7http://hdl.handle.net/10197/1250Paper presenened at the Second International Workshop on Applications of Ad hoc and Sensor Networks (AASNET), held at the 23rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications AINA 2009, 26-29 May 2009, Bradford, United KingdomThe number of active nodes in a WSN deployment governs both the longevity of the network and the accuracy of applications using the network’s data. As node hibernation techniques become more sophistocated, it is important that an accurate evaluation methodology is employed to ensure fair comparisons across different techniques. Examining both energy and accuracy ensures a claim of increased longevity for a particular technique can be contrasted against its associated drop, if any, in application accuracy. This change can also be as a result of increased latency and the accuracy encapsulates many aspects of WSN performance in one metric. In this work, we detail the first in a series of experiments designed to demonstrate the tradeoffs for a WSN and we employ mobility tracking as the application to benchmark accuracy. Additionally, we demonstrate experimental evidence for a potential adaptive mobility tracking protocol.456641 bytesapplication/pdfenWireless sensor networks--EvaluationNetwork performance (Telecommunication)Conference Publication10.1109/WAINA.2009.120https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/