Options
Perception of safety of cyclists in Dublin City
Date Issued
2013-01
Date Available
2019-05-14T08:01:49Z
Abstract
In recent years, cycling has been recognized and is being promoted as a sustainable mode of travel. The perception of cycling as an unsafe mode of travel is a significant obstacle in increasing the mode share of bicycles in a city. Hence, it is important to identify and analyze the factors which influence the safety experiences of the cyclists in an urban signalized multi-modal transportation network. Previous researches in the area of perceived safety of cyclists primarily considered the influence of network infrastructure and operation specific variables and are often limited to specific locations within the network. This study explores the factors that are expected to be important in influencing the perception of safety among cyclists but were never studied in the past. These factors include the safety behavior of existing cyclists, the users of other travel modes and their attitude toward cyclists, facilities and network infrastructures applicable to cycling as well as to other modes in all parts of an urban transportation network. A survey of existing cyclists in Dublin City was conducted to gain an insight into the different aspects related to the safety experience of cyclists. Ordered Logistic Regression (OLR) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were used in the analysis of survey responses. This study has revealed that respondents perceive cycling as less safe than driving in Dublin City. The new findings have shown that the compliance of cyclists with the rules of the road increase their safety experience, while the reckless and careless attitudes of drivers are exceptionally detrimental to their perceived safety. The policy implications of the results of analysis are discussed with the intention of building on the reputation of cycling as a viable mode of transportation among all network users.
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
Elsevier
Journal
Accident Analysis &Prevention
Volume
50
Start Page
499
End Page
511
Copyright (Published Version)
2012 Elsevier
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
ISSN
0001-4575
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
File(s)
Loading...
Name
re-revision feb 28 2012.pdf
Size
570.6 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
3bb73edc1fa9b19f61144a3f12993fa5
Owning collection