Options
In Defense of Decoding
Author(s)
Date Issued
2014
Date Available
2015-07-29T16:38:49Z
Abstract
Literacy instruction in primary schools in Ireland has fallen on hard times of late. Although the 1999 Revised Curriculum for Irish (Government of Ireland, 1999) specifically states that the recommended communicative approach encompasses all four skills (listening, speaking, reading and writing), it is often interpreted as emphasizing oral at the expense of written language. Perhaps as a result, research of the last decade shows that pupils’ Irish reading ability is suffering. While research on reading in Irish has been fairly limited, it shows rather disappointing results. A study conducted by the Department of Education and Science in 2008 found that "in approximately one third of classes, pupils had significant gaps in their skills of word recognition and reading comprehension" (DES 2008:60). More recently, Gileece et al. (2012) found attitudes toward reading in Irish declining among older children, even in Irish immersion and Gaeltacht schools, where skills are presumably higher than in the schools under consideration here. Finally, the latest evaluation of Irish schools (DES 2013) found Irish lessons to be unsatisfactory in 20% of classrooms inspected and 24% of student outcomes were unsatisfactory, well above the percentages for English and mathematics. Thus, there are grounds for concern, confirmed by reports from Irish teachers and scholars to be discussed below.
Other Sponsorship
Marie Curie Incoming International Fellowship
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
North American Association for Celtic Language Teachers
Journal
Journal of Celtic Language Learning
Volume
18
Start Page
11
End Page
40
Web versions
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
ISSN
1078-3911
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
File(s)data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2d25/a2d2529bb6dde4bf53da67388eaa6ed42b78cf11" alt="Thumbnail Image"
Loading...
Name
Stenson_and_Hickey_2014_In_Defense_of_Decoding_JCLL_18PostRefereeFinal.pdf
Size
224.29 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
4d39fbac35a606e5b9fc2b3cbb8980b4
Owning collection