Options
The Net as a Foraging Society: Flexible Communities
Author(s)
Date Issued
1998-01-01
Date Available
2019-04-29T11:05:55Z
Abstract
In discussions about electronic and virtual communities, community can variously refer to a moral community, a normative community, a community of practice, an intentional community, or a proximate community. The concept of “community” is, itself, deemed unproblematic, and often is used in either a reductivist or ethnocentric manner. An exploration of nonindustrial foraging societies is used to illustrate the wide variation in types and definitions of communities that exists. Social groups in foraging societies exhibit characteristics similar to those observed in technologically mediated social groups, and these similarities illustrate the deficiencies of typological or ideal-type definitions of “community,” as well as the artificial nature of a division between “real” and “electronic” communities. Groups that depend on computer-mediated communication among members can, and should, be examined using the same social science concepts and methods used to examine any other social groups.
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Journal
The Information Society
Volume
14
Issue
2
Start Page
97
End Page
106
Copyright (Published Version)
1998 Taylor & Francis Group
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
ISSN
0197-2243
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
File(s)
No Thumbnail Available
Name
virtband.htm
Size
58.23 KB
Format
HTML
Checksum (MD5)
31fb2e45d68197ad013916cf778100bf
Owning collection