Options
Economic aspects of personal injury compensation in Ireland
Author(s)
Date Issued
2010-07
Date Available
2010-12-14T14:52:26Z
Abstract
Victims of events including road accidents, workplace injuries and medical negligence
are compensated in the Irish legal system through once-off lump-sum awards. In cases
where victims have suffered incapacitating injuries but have extended life expectancy,
these awards include provision for loss of earnings and life-long medical care that can run
into millions. Where liability is contested, significant litigation costs also arise, but even
where liability is admitted, the determination of quantum is complex, requiring evidence
about future medical care costs, loss of earnings, life expectancy and the returns to be
expected from the investment of the lump sum award.
The once-off lump sum system of compensating successful plaintiffs has been criticised
over the years from both legal and economic perspectives, and change was recommended
in a Law Reform Commission report in 1996. Mr. Justice Nicholas Kearns, President of
the High Court, established recently a working group to consider the issues involved and
charged it to report by November 2010. Since 1995, courts in the United Kingdom have
been free to award periodic payments, as distinct from once-off lump sums, where the
parties agree, and since the passage of the 2003 Courts Act, whether or not they agree. It
is opportune to consider whether periodic payments should be introduced in Ireland and
this paper reviews the principal economic aspects of the issue. The paper also considers
whether a move to periodic payments would require changes to the government bond
market, specifically the issuance of long-dated index-linked Exchequer debt.
are compensated in the Irish legal system through once-off lump-sum awards. In cases
where victims have suffered incapacitating injuries but have extended life expectancy,
these awards include provision for loss of earnings and life-long medical care that can run
into millions. Where liability is contested, significant litigation costs also arise, but even
where liability is admitted, the determination of quantum is complex, requiring evidence
about future medical care costs, loss of earnings, life expectancy and the returns to be
expected from the investment of the lump sum award.
The once-off lump sum system of compensating successful plaintiffs has been criticised
over the years from both legal and economic perspectives, and change was recommended
in a Law Reform Commission report in 1996. Mr. Justice Nicholas Kearns, President of
the High Court, established recently a working group to consider the issues involved and
charged it to report by November 2010. Since 1995, courts in the United Kingdom have
been free to award periodic payments, as distinct from once-off lump sums, where the
parties agree, and since the passage of the 2003 Courts Act, whether or not they agree. It
is opportune to consider whether periodic payments should be introduced in Ireland and
this paper reviews the principal economic aspects of the issue. The paper also considers
whether a move to periodic payments would require changes to the government bond
market, specifically the issuance of long-dated index-linked Exchequer debt.
Sponsorship
Not applicable
Type of Material
Working Paper
Publisher
University College Dublin. School of Economics
Series
UCD Centre for Economic Research Working Paper Series
WP 10 23
Subject – LCSH
Personal injuries--Ireland
Damages--Economic aspects
Structured settlements
Web versions
Language
English
Status of Item
Not peer reviewed
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
File(s)
Loading...
Name
wp10_23.pdf
Size
143.22 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
6a5c12570bc4416bb0c109618191960b
Owning collection