Options
Comment on : Electoral Contests, incumbency advantages, and campaign finance
Author(s)
Date Issued
2009-09
Date Available
2010-11-29T14:23:19Z
Abstract
This paper completes Meirowitz (2008) by analyzing the effect of a
cap on political campaign spending in an environment where voters
have initial preferences over political candidates. The policy implications
are starkly different from the previously analyzed case where
voters are indifferent between candidates in the absence of campaign
spending. We find that a spending cap always favors the a priori
popular candidate. This result holds irrespective of whether it is the
incumbent or the challenger who is able to more effectively generate
and spend contributions.
cap on political campaign spending in an environment where voters
have initial preferences over political candidates. The policy implications
are starkly different from the previously analyzed case where
voters are indifferent between candidates in the absence of campaign
spending. We find that a spending cap always favors the a priori
popular candidate. This result holds irrespective of whether it is the
incumbent or the challenger who is able to more effectively generate
and spend contributions.
Sponsorship
Not applicable
Type of Material
Working Paper
Publisher
University College Dublin. School of Economics
Series
UCD Centre for Economic Research Working Paper Series
WP 09 13
Subject – LCSH
Campaign funds
Political campaigns--Mathematical models
Voting research
Web versions
Language
English
Status of Item
Not peer reviewed
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
File(s)
Loading...
Name
wp09.13.pdf
Size
131.81 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
66aadb32624167c2ad999fb87f57b8d5
Owning collection