Self-directed home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in patients with advanced cancer and poor performance status: a feasibility study
Files in This Item:
|12 DOConnor Self-Directed Home-Based Neuromuscular eletrical stimulation in patients.pdf||688.44 kB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||Self-directed home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in patients with advanced cancer and poor performance status: a feasibility study||Authors:||O'Connor, Dominic; Lennon, Olive; Wright, Sarah; Caulfield, Brian||Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/11629||Date:||16-Mar-2020||Online since:||2020-10-16T11:53:52Z||Abstract:||Purpose: Concurrent neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) involving sub-tetanic low frequency and tetanic high frequency which targets aerobic and muscular fitness is a potential alternative to conventional exercise in cancer rehabilitation. However, its safety and feasibility in patients with advanced cancer are unknown. The aim of this feasibility study was to determine safety and feasibility and evaluate changes in functional and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) outcomes in individuals with advanced cancer and poor performance status after concurrent NMES. These results should help inform the design of future studies. Methods: Participants with advanced cancer and poor performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale ≥ 2) (n = 18) were recruited. The intervention included a novel NMES intervention implemented over a 4-week period. Functional exercise capacity, lower limb muscle endurance and HR-QoL were measured by 6-min walk test (6MWT), 30-s sit-to-stand (30STS) and European Organization for Research and Treatment quality of life questionnaire core-30 (EORTC QLQ C30) pre and post-intervention. Participants unable to complete the 6-min walk test completed the timed up and go test. Participant experience and the impact of the intervention on daily life were investigated through semi-structured interviews. Results: Ten of 18 participants completed the intervention. No adverse events were reported. Seven of 8 participants improved 6MWT performance (2 of 2 improved timed up and go), 8 of 10 participants improved 30STS and 8 of 10 participants improved Global quality of life. Perceived benefits included improved mobility and muscle strength. Conclusions: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation appears safe and feasible in advanced cancer and may improve physical and HR-QoL outcomes. Future prospective trials are warranted to confirm these findings prior to clinical implementation in an advanced cancer setting.||Funding Details:||European Commission Horizon 2020||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Springer||Journal:||Supportive Care in Cancer||Volume:||28||Start page:||5529||End page:||5536||Copyright (published version):||2020 the Authors||Keywords:||Oncology; Rehabilitation; NMES; Neuromuscular electrical stimulation; Advanced cancer; Sit-to-stand; Physical function; Physical activity; Exercise; Adults; COPD||DOI:||10.1007/s00520-020-05394-0||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science Research Collection|
Insight Research Collection
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.